Tuesday, 4 August 2015

How it all turned bad for the Abbott Govt by Phillip Coorey





http://www.afr.com/news/politics/how-it-all-turned-bad-for-the-abbott-government-20150804-gir4p5

Is this the worst Government ever?

Sally Young looks at Abbott's legislative record in today's SMH

http://www.smh.com.au/comment/is-tony-abbotts-regime-the-worst-federal-government-ever-20150803-giqtnx.html

Republican Presidential Debate Time Is Here!



Why the Republican Party Can't Win




I have a confession to make. I'm a political junkie. I find the world around me and the people in it endlessly fascinating. Trying to understand why our society is the way it is keeps me up at night. Then there are the things that bring me joy. One of those is about to begin.



The debates between candidates for the Republican party nomination begin on August 6th. It's a circus. It's like watching the a train crash in slow motion. This year we have the clown in chief (Donald Trump) who will be trying to out wacky some of weirdest and wackiest candidates the Grand Old Party (GOP) have ever thrown together.

The contrast between the Republican debates and the Democratic debates is as fascinating as it is informative. Democratic debates are filled with sensible earnest looking people putting on their serious face and explaining how their 4,500 page tax plan is the good for the nation. Republicans on the other hand will just scream that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) who collects tax is in everybody's face and when elected President I'll abolish it. And the crowd goes wild!

As amusing as it is, it's indicative of a larger fact. Republican's cant win. The most obvious reason, is that American demographics have changed and are continuing to change. Since 1992 Republican candidates have legitimately won one election presidential election. That of 2004. The election of 2000, was so close, that it was called before all the votes were counted. It turns out, that after all the votes were counted, Al Gore, not George Bush won the state of Florida and therefore should have been declared president. 2004 was an anomaly due to the Iraq war.

How did it come to this?

America continues to diversify. In the 2012 presidential election 26.3 % of voters were non-white, up 2 % from 2008.. That doesn't sound like much, but consider that Obama won that particular segment by 80% - 17% for Mitt Romney and you can see that the GOP has a real problem. In fact after the 2012 election defeat the Republican National Committee (RNC) postmortem opened with the words:
The definition of insanity, is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."
Sadly nothing has changed since 2012.

Immigration



Latino (or Spanish speaking) voters are the second largest minority in the USA after African Americans. They make up 20 million eligible voters. They tend to be 1st or 2nd generation immigrants to america. The immigration programme is something they're quite familiar with. When Republican candidates talk about immigration, however they tend to do so in unflattering terms. Such as:
" When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists." - Donald Trump June 2015

Insanity

While it's obvious to anyone that insulting the voters you need for the general election is insane, it has to be done. The reason is that of course anyone running a line that is remotely palatable to voters in the general election simply can't win the Republican Party nomination.

But Why?

I think there are a 3 major reasons for this. The first we'll call the Echo Chamber Effect.


Echo Chamber Effect?

One of the most unexpected effects of the information revolution was the echo chamber effect. People were now free to gain information about the world around them from only the sources they believed in. People no longer sat down together to watch the evening news. News could be had from anywhere and from anyone. People didn't choose the mainstream media anymore, they wanted news they agreed with all the time.


This was the perfect time for Rupert Murdoch to start Fox News. Fox News is the most brazen partisan news organisation there has been, and probably ever will be. Fox News truly lives in an alternate universe where Barack Obama is a communist born in Kenya. They employ circular logic to brainwash viewers in exactly the same way a cult does. Any information (such as this blog) that does not agree with Fox is a product of the evil liberal media. Therefore it is rejected, which feeds the belief in Fox and the conservative media.

Amusingly (and frighteningly) it isn't just voters who become brainwashed by this nonsense. Karl Rove simply refused to believe Obama had been elected in 2012. Why? All the polls pointed to a Romney win. This doesn't make sense. Except it makes perfect sense, because Fox was lying about the polls and had been for months. His meltdown is amusing in a sad kind of way and you can watch it here:


Powerful Republicans are just as likely to fall into this alternate universe as the white working class voters who make up the majority of their constituency. It's an Orwellian place where facts have no meaning, change constantly or are ignored if not helpful to the republican cause. But the biggest problem about the echo chamber, is that Republicans have started to believe their own propaganda.


The Gerrymander Effect?

The USA has no independent umpire when it comes to drawing electoral boundaries. Gerrymandering is drawing the political boundaries for political gain. The original Gerrymander was enacted by Massachusetts Governor Elbridge Gerry in 1812 and looked like a salamander.


What happens is that both parties get together to group all voters of one party together to create a safe seat. Both party's benefit from this practice by reducing the amount of seats "in play" so that finite party resources can be spent on fewer and fewer marginal districts. Unfortunately in the USA today the House of Representatives has extremely few contested districts.

The average Congressman sits in a very safe seat. The public are extremely unlikely to throw him or her out. On the other hand, they must listen very closely to those in their party. If they become unpopular, they will lose the right to stand for their party. Their party who are caught up in this alternate universe where reality and facts do not tread. It leads to Congressman denouncing global warming as a devious plot designed to bring back socialism or whatever claptrap the echo chamber is reverberating with today. I would like to remind you that these people make policy decisions that effect not just America but their footprint echos throughout the 7.3 BILLION humans on planet Earth.


Free Trade Effect

Republican voters in America today tend to be the lesser educated manual laborers. Salt of the Earth people like miners, plumbers and manufacturing workers. These are the people who have suffered from overseas competition. Competition from economies that have far lower wages.. Real wages among the working and middle class in America haven't risen in 40 years.


It's always during difficult economic times that the far right raises its ugly head. As Americans lives fail to get better, people need someone to blame. According to the right wing eco-chamber it's Obama. But of course it's also immigration.




The American right has tied a Gordian Knot for itself. To break out of the echo chamber is damn near impossible. 4 years ago Mitt Romney didn't even try. Will Someone manage it this year?


Governor Jeb Bush


Not Jeb Bush who has put together the same team his brother had. So expect America to invade Belgium if he's ever elected. But of course he wont be. Being brother to the WORST AMERICAN PRESIDENT in a generation is a handicap he can't beat.

Governor Chris Christie


Current Goveror of New Jersey. Too moderate (sensible) for most Republican voters, but if by some miracle he is nominated might make a good opponent for Hillary, and a POSSIBLE GOOD PRESIDENT. Could be the one to untie the Gordian Knot.

Senator Ted Cruz


Political bomb thrower. GOD HELP AMERICA if he's ever elected


Governor Scott Walker


RIGHT WING IDEALOG. Current Governor of Wisconson. My Personal Pick for the nomination. I think he'll win the nomination, run against Hillary and lose.

Dr Ben Carsen


GROUND BREAKING NEUROSURGEON. Currently polling well. African American. A dark horse.

Governor Mike Huckabee


Former Governor of Arkansas, CHRISTIAN ACTIVIST and FOX NEWS PERSONALITY Governor Mike Huckabee. He's likable enough but definitely wont be the nominee. As a Fox News Talking Head, he cant break the Republican Party free of the echo chamber.


Senator Marco Rubio


CUBAN AMERICAN Marco Rubio from Florida is an impressive orator and could portray a more welcoming America in the general election. Which is why he won't win the nomination. An acolyte of Jeb Bush, he's handicapped by Bush's run as well. Possible untier of that Gordian Knot.


Senator Rand Paul


SON OF SENATOR RON PAUL, Rand has made his mark as a Libertarian Candidate. He's a bit of a political bomb thrower and far too unorthodox to be in real contention. Doesnt live in the echo chamber, therefore has little credibility to those inside it.


Governor John Kasich


Current Governor of Ohio, former member of the House of Representatives and former FOX NEWS PERSONALITY. Definitely wont break the echo chamber.

Donald Trump


Property magnate and Reality TV Star Donald Trump is a 21st Century PT Barnum. The circus is in town and he is the ringmaaster and head clown. His ties to the Clinton's will be exploited if he continues to lead in the polls. He revels in controversy. All the serious candidates are waiting for him to screw up and burn out.



The Clown


So we return to where we began. Donald Trump's popularity is a symptom of the sickness and depravity of the echo chamber world of right wing politics in the USA right now. While democrats chuckle to themselves about how this election is a shoe-in, the rest of America and the world aren't laughing. Candidates who could challenge the Democrats and make good Presidents are left by the roadside while morons and idiots hurl invective around insulting everyone who isn't white, straight and christian. It's quite the spectacle, but a healthy democracy needs at least two strong parties. What we have here is one party who aren't even trying (Clinton again) vs a drunk, disorderly knife fight. Americas problems that need addressing that don't go away. They just get shelved as too hard.

Sunday, 2 August 2015

Bronwyn Bishop Expenses Scandal

What the Bronwyn Bishop Scandal Says About Both Sides of Government




So Bronwyn Bishop has finally resigned from the Speakership of the Parliament of Australia. Thank goodness that's over. Being Speaker of the House was always an ambition for Bronnie, after a senior cabinet post became out of the question. Her points of order objections were the stuff of legend among those who inhabit the lower chamber.

One can understand then her reluctance to leave her position, it comes with a very nice residence, plenty of perks and makes you feel important. But the lasting impression that I have is that had she been sensible, she would still been speaker.



First of all there is the actual expenses claim. $5000 on a Helicopter ride when it really must have only saved 45 minutes at the most is ridiculous. But lets not forget the $90,000 European trip aimed at securing the Presidency of the Inter-Parliamentary Union.

Then there is claims to attend the weddings of colleagues where Parliamentary business was discussed with shadowy somebodies we cant know.

The rules are crystal clear. Party and personal business cannot be claimed. Commonwealth business can. Simples.

Of course these were bad. But not intolerable.

Secondly and I think more importantly was her (and the govt's) response to the scandal when it erupted. After a few days she fronted the media and refused to say sorry. She did say the biggest apology she could make is that she would pay back the money, but then claimed that she was on Commonwealth business talking to people as Speaker of the House. The fact that these people were Liberal Party doners went unsaid. This was fraud. Pure fraud. Had she said "The helicopter ride was wrongly classified and exorbitant. I'm repaying it, I made a mistake." She would still be speaker today. Instead she accepted no responsibility.


Thirdly this was a massive case of Bronwyn and Tony's chickens coming home to roost. It was Tony's opposition that mercilessly pursued the last Speaker of the House Peter Slipper. A man who was sentenced to 300 hrs of community service, given a 2 year good behavior bond and told to repay his $958 expenses claim on Cabcharge.


Bronwyn's conduct as speaker also contributed to the the force with which Labor pursued Mrs Bishop. The Speaker was unfair and divisive. She kindled genuine anger in those opposite. Therefore when the expenses scandal broke Labor (who have a vested interest in voters not paying too close attention to politicians expenses) decided to attack fully.



There is a disturbing trend in the last 8 years in Australia for politicians to ignore the big picture. This was pioneered by Kevin Rudd. John Howard had an overall narrative. He maintained that interest rates would always be lower under Liberal than Labor. He wanted everything he did and said to be interpreted through that lens. This is where Kevin, Julia and Tony have all failed. They play the 24hr media cycle. If you have more positive coverage in a given period of time than the other side you win. But with no long term plan, the small gains mean very little. Hugely popular PM's can fall quickly and hard.(eg PM Rudd.). The genius of Howard's approach is that even unpopular actions were interpreted through a lens created by Howard himself. It creates robust political support. What we have now is a bunch of private school prefects arguing over unimportant nonsense that is completely removed from everyday Australia's life.

It's a "Total War" approach to politics which eschews common sense and reason, boiling political life down to a Real Time Strategy video game. But we aren't just units on a battlefield to be ordered, rallied, cajoled or sacrificed. We have lives, homes, children, hopes and dreams.

John Howard, Paul Keating, Robert Menzies et.al understood this. They reasoned that as human beings we needed to trust our leaders. They outlined their vision for Australia and advocated powerfully for their ideas. 


Contrast that with todays generation of politicians. Explain to me Bill Shorten's vision for Australia. Or Tony Abbott's for that matter. They don't have one. They just grind on bit by bit day by day with minutia. Don't give an inch. Don't let them push you back. But none of it means anything.

Bronwyns way of dealing with her public sinning is indicative of this new culture. "Give them nothing". Nothing that could be construed as an apology. Especially if that is what is called for. The problem with this approach, is that it forgets who the message is aimed at. We the public can detect bullshit. And Bronnies confession without confessing stank. Bigtime.

So to any politicians or political staff reading this. Your culture is terrible. Wake up to yourself. You're not fooling us, just reminding us how we despise liars and removing hope for the future.

Bronwyn Bishop finally accepts the inevitable



2 Prof Farnsworths in one day!

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/bronwyn-bishop-resigns-as-speaker-20150802-gipry2.html

Friday, 31 July 2015

The Adam Goodes Controversy - what's really going on?

Adam Goodes Controversy – What's really going on here?






I have a confession to make. I don't like Australian Rules Football. The first 9 year of my life were spent in Punchbowl in Sydney where Rugby League was king and the Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs were Gods. The Mortimer brothers were my sporting hero's growing up.

In time my family moved to the St George area but I didn't lose my love of the blue and whites. My first sporting memory is of the 1979 grand final where St George beat Canterbury. I was 4 years old and devastated.

An Indigenous Football Player




Now I'm no stranger to booing players, in my Rugby League following days I used to boo Anthony Mundine. Anthony Mundine is an indigenous man who I felt at the time had an ego that had to be heard to be believed. I used to joke that Anthony Mundine couldn't make the game today because he was detained by a full length mirror.
In my more lucid moments if pushed I would have told you that Anthony Mundine was an excellent player and to break him psychologically on the field would give my team a match winning edge. I would also have told you that in no way was my booing of Mundine racist. I would have believed it when i told you that too, but 20 years later i can now understand that what I resented was an unaustralian (as i saw it) way of relating to fans, players and sponsors in professional sport. I disliked him because he didn't act like a product of my culture where humility is valued in its Sportsmen.
Men like Mark Taylor, Peter Sterling and even Sir Donald Bradman were grounded in this more humble culture. When Mundine came along saying I'm the greatest play-maker in the world, I found him offensive.

She Called him What?

The current controversy surrounding Adam Goodes is driving the media into a frenzy. I think we need to take a step back and get some context.

In 2013 during the Australian Football League's (AFL) Indigenous round, Adam Goodes (playing for the Sydney Swans) was called an ape by a 13 year old female supporter of Carlton. Goodes told officials what had happened and pointed the fan out. She was subsequently ejected from the arena. This news report from the seven network shows the incident.


The perpetrator of the abuse was indeed a 13 year old girl. Goodes gave a thoughtful and heartfelt press conference the next day. He said he did not blame her, but that society needed to be educated.


The Collingwood fan did call him after the press conference as he announced on twitter


"Just received a phone call from a young girl apologizing for her actions. Lets support her please#racismitstopswithme #IndigenousRound "


So what should Goodes have done? Should he indeed have called out the racist taunt or ignored it? Many Australians feel he should have ignored the girl because she was so young. He even admitted that she could not have understood how the taunt would be understood by him.

To that I say BULLSHIT! Should minorities all over Australia be subject to racism because people don't know any better? Of course not. It doesn't matter if you are 13 or 93, racism is wrong and should be called out.

To ignore the girl would be to accept the status quo. To call her out would be to cause considerable trouble for her on that night, but remember she did call him an ape. That is a clearly racist statement.

The problem for Goodes though is that he tripped one of the unconscious nerves in white Australia's subconscious. That of the black man dominating the white woman. To make it worse she was 13, not even a woman. That's how it started.

So from then on Goodes was booed whenever he touched the ball. He was called a sook, because he couldn't take being called names.

This year during the AFL's indigenous round (the jerseys, the ball, etc were all themed Aboriginal) Goodes was receiving boos from the Carlton supporters. So after he kicked an aboriginal themed ball through an aboriginal themed goal wearing an aboriginal themed jersey he did an aboriginal themed wardance as celebration. Here's the video:


EVERYONE LOSES THEIR MIND!!!!

What ever happened to sport as entertainment! That was awesomely entertaining and in the best tradition of crowd/player interaction. Frankly I wouldn't have been surprised if Goodes had walked up to the TV camera at the end of the match and yelled "ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED!!!!"

Now Goodes isn't the first sportsman or woman to have a go at the crowd after scoring a goal, but of course as the 1st aboriginal player to do so, Goodes tripped another unconscious nerve. The angry black man.
Australia tends to be a tolerant and accepting society, minority figures are embraced and loved. People like Christine Anu, Ernie Dingo, Ahn Doe, to name just a few. However that minority figure must not question the status quo. Minorities should be grateful for the country we provide for them.

Of course that the riches we enjoy were indeed hard won, they were hard won from another people. Those people are still here, and when they (the aboriginal people) remind us of that fact, and that they have a powerful, distinct, ancient culture white Australia loses the plot.

So Adam Goodes is an (unconsciously scary) sook. He needs to calm down and stop bullying the Carlton supporters and that poor white girl.

Bullshit.

White Australia has 228 years of keeping the black man down. white Australia systematically dispossessed and then ethnically cleansed black Australia. white Australia attempted genocide. Frankly Aboriginal Australia has been more forgiving than we would be under the same circumstances.

Herein lies the problem for white Australia. Many in this country find it difficult to come to terms with the genocide perpetrated by our ancestors on Mr Goodes ancestors. It's a difficult journey.

It's a journey that I 20 years ago on the sidelines at Kogarah Oval booing Anthony Mundine had not yet embarked on. It's why one half of white australia looks at the other half and says "stop being so goddam racist" while the other half who haven't made the journey yet look back in horror and say: "I'm not racist, the big scary black man threatened me". They don't understand their own triggers.

One final thing, if you are hit by Adam Goodes imaginary spear, lie still until the imaginary paramedics come to your aid and take you to imaginary hospital.

YA BUNCH OF SOOKS!

A.Russell